README Review

Use this before considering a README rewrite complete.

Questions

• does this still describe the whole project?
• would a newcomer understand what ORCA is?
• is one feature taking too much space?
• is install and getting started clear?
• is the README too long for a top-level entry page?
• should any section move into dedicated docs?
• does the page help both users and contributors find the next right place?
• does the README reflect the strongest recurring work shown by the vault and live artifacts?
• did we keep the framing grounded without turning it into autobiography?
• did generic AI-framework language creep in where evidence-backed language should have been used?

Good Outcome

The README should help a reader:

• understand ORCA quickly
• decide whether it is relevant
• start using it
• find the correct deeper docs
• leave with a believable picture of the work ORCA is actually built to support